The Lear´s Macaw Anodorhynchus leari, a CITES Appendix 1 species endemic to north-east Brazil, is designated as Critically Endangered (IUCN Red List category – www.birdlife.org) because it has an extremely small population which breeds and is resident in one area (3,900 km2). In its semi-arid habitat of the caatinga it has a close relationship with the licuri palm (Syagrus coronatus), which produces the hard fruits forming the major part of the macaw’s diet. Given that licurí palm-stands formerly covered 250,000 km2 but have been vastly reduced by livestock-grazing, it is threatened by the degradation of its habitat. It further threatened by illegal trapping for trade (BirdLife International 2000, 2006), and there are occasional shootings of macaws by farmers where attacks on maize crops occur. The most recent (2006) estimate of the total wild population is 632 birds.
Actions for the conservation of the wild population and its habitat have been underway for a number of years, and a plan has been published recently to clarify and prioritise the necessary conservation measures (IBAMA 2006). The plan also includes the use of captive breeding as an ex situ conservation tool for the species. The Loro Parque Fundación (LPF) of Tenerife, Spain, together with the Brazilian Government agency IBAMA (Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources) and other partners, is contributing to the field conservation project. Furthermore, the LPF Curator, Matthias Reinschmidt is the international studbook keeper with support from Onildo Marini-Filho of IBAMA and Ryan Watson of Al Wabra WidlifePreservation. This article presents current information about the captive population.
Table 1. Distribution of Lear’s Macaws in the managed population
|Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation||Qatar||4.5.0|
|Crax – Wildlife Research Society||Brazil||1.1.0|
|Harewood Hall||United Kingdom||1.2.0|
|Loro Parque Fundación||Spain||2.2.0|
|Rio de Janeiro Zoo||Brazil||6.5.0|
|Sao Paulo Zoo||Brazil||3.5.0|
In the studbook (Reinschmidt 2006) are seven participating institutions with 43 officially incorporated birds (Table 1). These are the birds which currently form the managed captive population which is under the coordination of IBAMA, the birds being on deposit from the Brazilian Government. There is an additional living specimen confiscated by the competent authorities in Brazil in October 2006, which will be incorporated into the managed population.
There are a further two female living specimens also likely to join the official population. There are an undisclosed number of Lear’s Macaws in Switzerland, for which there is no definite prospect of their inclusion in the officially managed population.
Demographically the managed population requires a breeding momentum to add more young birds, as can be seen from the age pyramid (Figure 1), and improvement of the current sex ratio of 0.74, by the addition of more males. However, the breeding programme is necessarily at an early stage. Because most of the macaws have been recruited to the population as confiscated young birds taken in their first year of life, there are close estimates of the ages, even though they are registered in the studbook as wild-caught. Furthermore, endoscopic examination of the condition and stage of development of the gonads of these birds reveal that at 7 to 8 years of age they are only just entering reproductive maturity (L. Crosta and L. Timossi, in litt.). This coincides well with the first studbook registered breeding occurring in 2006 at Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation in Qatar, which holds the oldest birds.
Figure 1. Age pyramid of the managed population of Lear’s Macaws.
Given that 42 of the studbook registered macaws are wild-caught, founders apparently constitute 97.6% of the captive population, a remarkable and positive situation. However, given that these macaws have been taken from nests, and often were confiscated together, there is a reasonable probability that the founders (which by definition should be unrelated) include siblings. However,despite this possibility, the genetic situation overall in the Lear’s Macaw studbook is favourable, as can be demonstrated by work in progress of Prof. Cristina Miyaki and her team at the Institute of Molecular Genetics, University of Sao Paulo. Dr Miyaki has carried out DNA analysis from blood samples obtained from these macaws, and has been able to calculate a genetic similarity index between all of the individuals. Thus she has all possible pairings ranked according to the statistical probability of genetic relatedness of the birds (in five ranks, from lowest relatedness = A, to highest = E).
In general terms (scientific details, Miyaki et al.,in prep.) this indicates the following. The macaws sampled (17.21) have a total of 357 pairing combinations, which show 115 (32.2%) in the low relatedness categories (A,B), 131 (36.7%) in the medium category (C) , and 111 (31.1%) in the high categories (D,E). Currently, all 17 males with known similarity indices are paired with females, with relative proportions of genetic relatedness as shown in table 2. The same table indicates the changes in these proportions if re-pairing of macaws takes place within each institution, i.e. before interchange of macaws between institutions. The pairings according to institution are shown in table 3.
Table 2. Pairings of Lear’s Macaws in the managed population: level of genetic relatedness currently and after re-pairing within each institution.
|Level of relatedness||Current pairings||Re-pairings|
|Low (A, B)||5||29.4||11||64.7|
Table 3. Level of relatedness in possible re-pairings of Lear’s Macaws within each institution.
|Al Wabra Wildlife Preservation||1A, 1B, 2C|
|Crax – Wildlife Research Society||1E|
|Loro Parque Fundación||1B, 1C|
|Lymington Foundation||1A, 1C or 2B|
|Rio de Janeiro Zoo||4A, 1C|
|Sao Paulo Zoo||3A|
Given that in the first instance it is easier to manage species populations on a regional basis, it would make sense to exchange birds for further re-pairings between the holding institutions in Brazil. From the 11.15 captive Lear’s Macaws currently in Brazil, it is possible to make 11 low-relatedness (A) pairings. Any intention to re-pair these birds must take into account the compatibility of the individuals within pairs, revealed primarily by their behaviour, and following precautions:
1. For birds not in successfully reproducing pairs, give the possibility for free mate choice in flocks. However, before breaking non-reproducing pairs, take age into consideration.
2.Aim for most genetically acceptable pairings, but before breaking existing pairs take breeding history and age into consideration.
BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Editions and BirdLife International
BirdLife International (2006) Species factsheet: Anodorhynchus leari. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 7/12/2006
IBAMA (2006) Management Plan for the Lear’s Macaw (Anodorhynchus leari). Endangered Species Series 4. Brasilia: Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, Fauna Species Protection Coordination.
Reinschmidt, M (2006) Lear’s Macaw (Anodorhynchus leari) International Studbook, Annual Report and Recommendations for 2006. Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife: Loro Parque Fundación.
Foto: Matthias Reinschmidt/Loro Parque Fundación
Saturday 13th April 2019
I have been made aware of an organisation - Jardins da Arara de lear - set up in Brazil to solve the problem of the lack of licuri plams, which used to provide much of the natural diet of Lear's Macaws in the wild. As regular visitors to the ... Read More »
" Naturam expellas furca, tamen usque recurret "
( If you drive out nature with a pitchfork, she will soon find a way back)
Horace (65-8 BC)